I think Stalin's collectivization is worse than Mussolini's Facist rule. The facist rule was the belief in government rule rather than considering what other people had to say. A dictator would do that anyway. Stalin's collectivization meant that he had complete rule over all land and that he owned all the land. Therefore, no one actually owned any property. I think that is worse becuase people aren't living in their own home, they would be living in a dictator's home which is scary.
In my opinion, Stalin's collectivization is worse than Mussolini's Fascist rule. Stalin;s collectivation was that he had complete rule over all land and that he owned all the land. The Fascist rule was the belief in government rule, instead of considering what other people thought. No one really owned their own land.
I think that Stalin's collectivization was worse because it took complete control of what was supposed to be "private" land. To make it even worse, they killed all the livestock that was on the farms. All the hard work those farmers had put in was destroyed. It was very unfair because the people had no choice in this so they just had to watch all their hard work go to waste. This was all to make Russia an "industrial" country.
I think that Stalin's collectivation is much worse than mussilini's fascist. In my opinion Mussilini's fascism is just like a dictator. A true dictator would have complete power anyway. But Stalin says that he also owns all the land. That is completely unfair to citizens that make a living off of their land. Hes an extremeist when it comes to dictators.
In my opinion, Mussolini's Facist rule was worse than Stalin's collectiviztion, because it controlled all aspects of life. The Facist rule aimed to control political, economis,social, intellectual and cultural lives of the Italian people.Whereas collectivisation used by Stalin, only took away your land and elliminated personal farming. Mussolini even made agreements with the Catholic church to promote facism, by only allowing the Vatican city to remain independant, if the Pope agreed to support the Facist cause, and convince church goers to do the same. The facist rule glorified state before the individual, and therefor didn't really care about the individual, as long as the state was fine. There for, I think facism is worse than collectivization.
Fascists placed the nation over citizens and individuals in terms of importance. On the other hand, collectivization took away private land from farmers and gave it to the government. I think taking away someones property and livelihood is worse than ignoring their wishes, especially when if comes to taking control facilities needed for economic reason and basic needs.
In my opinion if I had to choose which one was worse between the Mussolini's Fascist rule or Stalin's collectivization. I would say the Fascist rule was scarier. The Fascist rule controlled political, economic, social, intellectual and cultural lives of the Italian people.Whereas collectivization used by Stalin, only took away your land and eliminated personal farming. They were both very unfair but the Fascists were a step ahead. The Stalin's wanted to stop all private farming but the Fascists wanted everything. Nothing was really fair and the the Fascists got everything they wanted which was scary.
If I had to pick the greater of two evils, I would actually have to pick collectivization. Yes on paper it seems that collectivization is much better than fascism because it only "takes away" the land rights of people, while fascism "takes away" all political, economical, social, and cultural rights away from people, it is actually the motives that one should be looking at. Behind collectivization there was a false sense of parental authority, the upper felt that they could "rise up" in the grand scheme of things, and only they themselves could accomplish such a thing. Fascism on the other hand, well for the most part, was an attempt to improve the overall condition of the country at the time. The people that started the movement believed that they could actually improve the country but needed a bit of power to actually do it. That is why I find fascism the lesser of two evils.
In my opinion, Joseph Stalin's collectivization was worse than Benito Mussolini's Fascist rule. Stalin decided to take over all privately owned farm land away from the civilians that owned it. I am strongly against not allowing ownership of land because that takes away any options for the civilians to live their lives. They had one choice; work underneath someone on a farm. That is not right because if a man believes he can open a farm and provide for his family that way, no one has the right to tell him not to, let alone the government. That is why I believe Stalin's system is much worse.
The Fascist rule controlled political, economic, social, intellectual and cultural lives of the Italian people. Under the Stalin's collectivization, the government took control farms and the peasants worked them. The Mussolini's Fascist rule was worse than Stalin's collectivization. It controlled all aspects of life. The Fascist rule was the belief in government rule, instead of considering what other people thought. No one really owned their own land. Fascists could get any thing they wanted and no one could do anything about it.
I believe that Joseph Stalin's 'Collectivization' was worse than Benito Mussolini's Fascist. In collectivization all the private farms were eliminated and they were all owned by the government. This meant that the farmers did not have something to call their own. This evil plot also led to the famine of 1932-33 in which 10 million people died. Also, collectivization had a bigger impact than Fascism.
Fascist is better than collectivization. Collectivization, one person will own everyones property, all farms will be eliminated. No one owned their own land. The stalin made the peasants work. In fascist they gain control of people. Collectivization killed the live stock. He destroyed the agriculture to make an idustrial country. The people couldnt live their own lives. Fascist allowed the people to go their own way but they still had a rules to go by. Collectivization is much more harsh and unfair than Fascist
In my opinion Stalin’s collectivization was worse than Mussolini’s fascists. In collectivization Stalin was the dictator he rules everything. He took away all the lands that were privately owned and had given it to the Government. Mussolini’s fascist rule was made to control the people’s political rights, but these people were trying to make a difference. He was trying to hard to make a strong central government. He was trying to help the government and the country. His intentions were good. Under Stalins it is said that 10 million people had died due to a famine.
Between Mussolini's Fascist rule and Stalin's collectivization, I am mostly against Mussolini's Fascist. The idea thast they empowered almost everything is intolerable to my ears. People had no say and their thoughts were not listened to. Government had complete control of the lives of the people. Their government was led by a dictator, and I have always been against that.
Due during this time, there had to be tough ruling. The worst of them was the Mussolini's Facist. It was the worst because Facist took away all aspects for the Italian people, but collectivization only took away land. The italians had a lot more with collectivization. Granted the land was owned by one person under the rule of Stalin, but they had more freedom rather than being controlled of the economy, social or political etc. That is why I believe that the Facist is the worst of the two rules.
Between both Mussolini's rule and Stalin's collectivization, Stalin's collectivization was worse. For Stalins collectivization he was a dictator and ruled everything by himself. All the family owned farmers were taken over by the government. Stalin practically destroyed argiculture. Under the Fascist rule, they controlled political, economic, social, intellectual and cultural lives of the Italian people.
I think Stalin's collectivization is worse than Mussolini's Facist rule. The facist rule was the belief in government rule rather than considering what other people had to say. A dictator would do that anyway. Stalin's collectivization meant that he had complete rule over all land and that he owned all the land. Therefore, no one actually owned any property. I think that is worse becuase people aren't living in their own home, they would be living in a dictator's home which is scary.
ReplyDeleteIn my opinion, Stalin's collectivization is worse than Mussolini's Fascist rule. Stalin;s collectivation was that he had complete rule over all land and that he owned all the land. The Fascist rule was the belief in government rule, instead of considering what other people thought. No one really owned their own land.
ReplyDeleteI think that Stalin's collectivization was worse because it took complete control of what was supposed to be "private" land. To make it even worse, they killed all the livestock that was on the farms. All the hard work those farmers had put in was destroyed. It was very unfair because the people had no choice in this so they just had to watch all their hard work go to waste. This was all to make Russia an "industrial" country.
ReplyDeleteI think that Stalin's collectivation is much worse than mussilini's fascist. In my opinion Mussilini's fascism is just like a dictator. A true dictator would have complete power anyway. But Stalin says that he also owns all the land. That is completely unfair to citizens that make a living off of their land. Hes an extremeist when it comes to dictators.
ReplyDeleteIn my opinion, Mussolini's Facist rule was worse than Stalin's collectiviztion, because it controlled all aspects of life. The Facist rule aimed to control political, economis,social, intellectual and cultural lives of the Italian people.Whereas collectivisation used by Stalin, only took away your land and elliminated personal farming. Mussolini even made agreements with the Catholic church to promote facism, by only allowing the Vatican city to remain independant, if the Pope agreed to support the Facist cause, and convince church goers to do the same. The facist rule glorified state before the individual, and therefor didn't really care about the individual, as long as the state was fine. There for, I think facism is worse than collectivization.
ReplyDeleteFascists placed the nation over citizens and individuals in terms of importance. On the other hand, collectivization took away private land from farmers and gave it to the government. I think taking away someones property and livelihood is worse than ignoring their wishes, especially when if comes to taking control facilities needed for economic reason and basic needs.
ReplyDeleteIn my opinion if I had to choose which one was worse between the Mussolini's Fascist rule or Stalin's collectivization. I would say the Fascist rule was scarier. The Fascist rule controlled political, economic, social, intellectual and cultural lives of the Italian people.Whereas collectivization used by Stalin, only took away your land and eliminated personal farming. They were both very unfair but the Fascists were a step ahead. The Stalin's wanted to stop all private farming but the Fascists wanted everything. Nothing was really fair and the the Fascists got everything they wanted which was scary.
ReplyDeleteIf I had to pick the greater of two evils, I would actually have to pick collectivization. Yes on paper it seems that collectivization is much better than fascism because it only "takes away" the land rights of people, while fascism "takes away" all political, economical, social, and cultural rights away from people, it is actually the motives that one should be looking at. Behind collectivization there was a false sense of parental authority, the upper felt that they could "rise up" in the grand scheme of things, and only they themselves could accomplish such a thing. Fascism on the other hand, well for the most part, was an attempt to improve the overall condition of the country at the time. The people that started the movement believed that they could actually improve the country but needed a bit of power to actually do it. That is why I find fascism the lesser of two evils.
ReplyDeleteIn my opinion, Joseph Stalin's collectivization was worse than Benito Mussolini's Fascist rule. Stalin decided to take over all privately owned farm land away from the civilians that owned it. I am strongly against not allowing ownership of land because that takes away any options for the civilians to live their lives. They had one choice; work underneath someone on a farm. That is not right because if a man believes he can open a farm and provide for his family that way, no one has the right to tell him not to, let alone the government. That is why I believe Stalin's system is much worse.
ReplyDeleteThe Fascist rule controlled political, economic, social, intellectual and cultural lives of the Italian people. Under the Stalin's collectivization, the government took control farms and the peasants worked them. The Mussolini's Fascist rule was worse than Stalin's collectivization. It controlled all aspects of life. The Fascist rule was the belief in government rule, instead of considering what other people thought. No one really owned their own land. Fascists could get any thing they wanted and no one could do anything about it.
ReplyDeleteI believe that Joseph Stalin's 'Collectivization' was worse than Benito Mussolini's Fascist. In collectivization all the private farms were eliminated and they were all owned by the government. This meant that the farmers did not have something to call their own. This evil plot also led to the famine of 1932-33 in which 10 million people died. Also, collectivization had a bigger impact than Fascism.
ReplyDeleteFascist is better than collectivization. Collectivization, one person will own everyones property, all farms will be eliminated. No one owned their own land. The stalin made the peasants work. In fascist they gain control of people. Collectivization killed the live stock. He destroyed the agriculture to make an idustrial country. The people couldnt live their own lives. Fascist allowed the people to go their own way but they still had a rules to go by. Collectivization is much more harsh and unfair than Fascist
ReplyDeleteIn my opinion Stalin’s collectivization was worse than Mussolini’s fascists. In collectivization Stalin was the dictator he rules everything. He took away all the lands that were privately owned and had given it to the Government. Mussolini’s fascist rule was made to control the people’s political rights, but these people were trying to make a difference. He was trying to hard to make a strong central government. He was trying to help the government and the country. His intentions were good. Under Stalins it is said that 10 million people had died due to a famine.
ReplyDeleteBetween Mussolini's Fascist rule and Stalin's collectivization, I am mostly against Mussolini's Fascist. The idea thast they empowered almost everything is intolerable to my ears. People had no say and their thoughts were not listened to. Government had complete control of the lives of the people. Their government was led by a dictator, and I have always been against that.
ReplyDeleteDue during this time, there had to be tough ruling. The worst of them was the Mussolini's Facist. It was the worst because Facist took away all aspects for the Italian people, but collectivization only took away land. The italians had a lot more with collectivization. Granted the land was owned by one person under the rule of Stalin, but they had more freedom rather than being controlled of the economy, social or political etc. That is why I believe that the Facist is the worst of the two rules.
ReplyDeleteBetween both Mussolini's rule and Stalin's collectivization, Stalin's collectivization was worse. For Stalins collectivization he was a dictator and ruled everything by himself. All the family owned farmers were taken over by the government. Stalin practically destroyed argiculture. Under the Fascist rule, they controlled political, economic, social, intellectual and cultural lives of the Italian people.
ReplyDelete